<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Plurk or Not to Plurk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kimfenolio.com/06-03-2008/to-plurk-or-not-to-plurk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kimfenolio.com/06-03-2008/to-plurk-or-not-to-plurk/</link>
	<description>Recognizing the importance of convenience, quality and versatility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:58:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.kimfenolio.com/06-03-2008/to-plurk-or-not-to-plurk/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimfenolio.com/?p=29#comment-867</guid>
		<description>Krysta,
Plurk does have a way to private message. Underneath the message field there&#039;s a little drop down that allows you to type in one or more names that will send what&#039;s called a Private Plurk. It&#039;s pretty cool!

-Kim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krysta,<br />
Plurk does have a way to private message. Underneath the message field there&#8217;s a little drop down that allows you to type in one or more names that will send what&#8217;s called a Private Plurk. It&#8217;s pretty cool!</p>
<p>-Kim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krysta</title>
		<link>http://www.kimfenolio.com/06-03-2008/to-plurk-or-not-to-plurk/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Krysta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimfenolio.com/?p=29#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Twitter can kiss Plurks ass. The only thing that I find frustrating is no private messaging to let other users know to hook up with me. So that we send things back forth because of only one option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter can kiss Plurks ass. The only thing that I find frustrating is no private messaging to let other users know to hook up with me. So that we send things back forth because of only one option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary S</title>
		<link>http://www.kimfenolio.com/06-03-2008/to-plurk-or-not-to-plurk/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimfenolio.com/?p=29#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this post and the other GNI Unplug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this post and the other GNI Unplug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Goodrich</title>
		<link>http://www.kimfenolio.com/06-03-2008/to-plurk-or-not-to-plurk/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Goodrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimfenolio.com/?p=29#comment-29</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a fun tool. It&#039;s more of an actual conversation as each plurk can develop a context beyond its initial statement by replies. You don&#039;t have to send a new single message if you want to continue a conversation. That means you also aren&#039;t forced to follow a conversation that doesn&#039;t interest you. Very cool. 

It&#039;s also viral by design, which is a good thing from two aspects, scalability and accessibility. When someone plurks, their friends see it, if a friend replies, their friends see the whole context and so on and so on... (c; 

That&#039;s great from the getting people involved standpoint very viral, and because it&#039;s based on a plurk&#039;s context, There isn&#039;t the need to follow everyone in case  you miss something (that doesn&#039;t mean it won&#039;t happen, just that it doesn&#039;t have to happen).

It brings up a question though. How does that work when a a friend replies to a plurk from a protected account or from a private plurk?  I don&#039;t know yet, but it makes me wonder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a fun tool. It&#8217;s more of an actual conversation as each plurk can develop a context beyond its initial statement by replies. You don&#8217;t have to send a new single message if you want to continue a conversation. That means you also aren&#8217;t forced to follow a conversation that doesn&#8217;t interest you. Very cool. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also viral by design, which is a good thing from two aspects, scalability and accessibility. When someone plurks, their friends see it, if a friend replies, their friends see the whole context and so on and so on&#8230; (c; </p>
<p>That&#8217;s great from the getting people involved standpoint very viral, and because it&#8217;s based on a plurk&#8217;s context, There isn&#8217;t the need to follow everyone in case  you miss something (that doesn&#8217;t mean it won&#8217;t happen, just that it doesn&#8217;t have to happen).</p>
<p>It brings up a question though. How does that work when a a friend replies to a plurk from a protected account or from a private plurk?  I don&#8217;t know yet, but it makes me wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Fenolio</title>
		<link>http://www.kimfenolio.com/06-03-2008/to-plurk-or-not-to-plurk/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Fenolio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimfenolio.com/?p=29#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Great thoughts there Alison! Thanks for sharing.

I was thinking Plurk could really do some amazing things if they incorporated the Search function and allowed for groups. A Plurk user administrates and people can join. I would encourage the world to come to Plurk if that were the case! Think of the interactivity and the planning that could be had without friending or following others!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thoughts there Alison! Thanks for sharing.</p>
<p>I was thinking Plurk could really do some amazing things if they incorporated the Search function and allowed for groups. A Plurk user administrates and people can join. I would encourage the world to come to Plurk if that were the case! Think of the interactivity and the planning that could be had without friending or following others!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlisonL</title>
		<link>http://www.kimfenolio.com/06-03-2008/to-plurk-or-not-to-plurk/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>AlisonL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kimfenolio.com/?p=29#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Hey Kim - I agree with you! I found my productivity nose dive yesterday as my obsession with plurk increased. It was great fun, but kinda like cotton candy, after it was all over I couldn&#039;t remember the jist of what was going on, where it happened and it almost just vanished into thin air!
Definitely agree - with this mode of communication a search feature is ESSENTIAL...perhaps the hash&#039;s will make a reappearance here and that will help
But overall as far as people I like to interact with, I definitely prefer Plurk, much more intimate and I&#039;ve already made a couple new friends who I feel like it was easier to get to know through this interface...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kim &#8211; I agree with you! I found my productivity nose dive yesterday as my obsession with plurk increased. It was great fun, but kinda like cotton candy, after it was all over I couldn&#8217;t remember the jist of what was going on, where it happened and it almost just vanished into thin air!<br />
Definitely agree &#8211; with this mode of communication a search feature is ESSENTIAL&#8230;perhaps the hash&#8217;s will make a reappearance here and that will help<br />
But overall as far as people I like to interact with, I definitely prefer Plurk, much more intimate and I&#8217;ve already made a couple new friends who I feel like it was easier to get to know through this interface&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

